In ogni modo, dovevo avere un'educazione speciale per raggiungere i miei pari. Ha abbassato la mia autostima. L'ansia ha sviluppato altri problemi, come l'ansia della salute e il perfezionismo. Non alzavo la mia mano per paura di sbagliare. Come sono cresciuta, ho iniziato a soffrire di agorafobia, disturbi ossessivi compulsivi e depressione clinica. Ho pensato che quello che avevo andasse oltre la timidezza. Mi sono domandata con che cosa stessi combattendo.
E ho aspettato che qualcuno mi aiutasse, ma nessuno si disturbava a farlo. Ho iniziato ad avere attacchi di panico, e, ancora peggio, pensieri di morte. Un anno fa, mi sono ripresa da quei giorni bui.
Ho fatto una promessa a me stessa che non mi sarei arresa. Il mutismo selettivo non era una maledizione, ma un regalo. Ho partecipato a Toastmasters. Risate Applausi Toastmasters mi ha mostrato la luce e la speranza per il futuro. Ho esitato un paio di volte, ma mi sono rifiutata di farmi trascinare indietro nel buio. Toastmasters ha sviluppato la mia forza e confidenza.
Sono diventata una consulente al Youth Playhouse Theater. Sono entrata al college.
Fin dal primo giorno di scuola, ho alzato la mano quasi ogni giorno. Ci sono nuove sfide da affrontare, come diventare una bibliotecaria e un'autrice di bestseller. Un fiore non sboccia in una notte.
Episodi di One Piece (prima stagione)
Non diventa da bocciolo a fiore all'improvviso. Ci vuole pazienza, tempo, e tantissima preziosa noia. Applausi English to Italian: Can a computer write poetry? This is a provocative question. You think about it for a minute, and you suddenly have a bunch of other questions like: What is a computer?
What is poetry? What is creativity? But these are questions that people spend their entire lifetime trying to answer, not in a single TED Talk. So we're going to have to try a different approach.
Charles Perrault – Il Viaggio di Martis
So up here, we have two poems. One of them is written by a human, and the other one's written by a computer. I'm going to ask you to tell me which one's which. You're not going to have long to read because we haven't got long to do this speech. Have a go, start reading.
- Spain v. the Ottomans, 16th c. (HISTORY, 2012, v. 1);
- PriceGrabber - Il bambino con la pistol Miscellaneous DVDs & Videos.
- Deadly Dreams: Driving Force.
- English to Italian specializing in history, literature, religion, music, sport, healthy food?
- Navigation menu.
- When Justice is Served!
- John Hume and the Revision of Irish Nationalism.
Hands up if you think Poem 1 was written by a human. OK, most of you.
Hands up if you think Poem 2 was written by a human. Very brave of you, because the first one was written by the human poet William Blake. The second one was written by an algorithm that took all the language from my Facebook feed on one day and then regenerated it algorithmically, according to methods that I'll describe a little bit later on. But most of you got that right, it's probably a little bit easy.
So let's try another test. Again, you haven't got ages to read this, so just trust your gut. Poem 1: A lion roars and a dog barks. Poem 2: Oh! So if you think the first poem was written by a human, put your hand up. And if you think the second poem was written by a human, put your hand up. It was much harder.
The answer is, the first poem was generated by an algorithm called Racter, that was created back in the s, and the second poem was written by a guy called Frank O'Hara, who happens to be one of my favorite human poets. Laughter So what we've just done now is a Turing test for poetry.
The Turing test was first proposed by this guy, Alan Turing, in , in order to answer the question, can computers think? Alan Turing believed that if a computer was able to have a to have a text-based conversation with a human, with such proficiency such that the human couldn't tell whether they are talking to a computer or a human, then the computer can be said to have intelligence.
So in , my friend Benjamin Laird and I, we created a Turing test for poetry online. It's called bot or not, and you can go and play it for yourselves. But basically, it's the game we just played. You're presented with a poem, you don't know whether it was written by a human or a computer and you have to guess. So thousands and thousands of people have taken this test online, so we have results. And what are the results? Well, Turing said that if a computer could fool a human 30 percent of the time that it was a human, then it passes the Turing test for intelligence.
We have poems on the bot or not database that have fooled 65 percent of human readers into thinking it was written by a human. So, I think we have an answer to our question. According to the logic of the Turing test, can a computer write poetry? Well, yes, absolutely it can. But if you're feeling a little bit uncomfortable with this answer, that's OK.
If you're having a bunch of gut reactions to it, that's also okay because this isn't the end of the story. Let's play our third and final test. Again, you're going to have to read and tell me which you think is human. Poem 1: Red flags the reason for pretty flags. So hands up if you think Poem 1 was written by a human.
Whoa, that's a lot more people. So you'd be surprised to find that Poem 1 was written by the very human poet Gertrude Stein. Now before we go on, let me describe very quickly and simply, how RKCP works. So RKCP is an algorithm designed by Ray Kurzweil, who's a director of engineering at Google and a firm believer in artificial intelligence. So, you give RKCP a source text, it analyzes the source text in order to find out how it uses language, and then it regenerates language that emulates that first text.
So in the poem we just saw before, Poem 2, the one that you all thought was human, it was fed a bunch of poems by a poet called Emily Dickinson and looked at the way she used language, learned the model, and then it regenerated a model according to that same structure. But the important thing to know about RKCP is that it doesn't know the meaning of the words it's using. The language is just raw material, it could be Chinese, it could be in Swedish, it could be the collected language from your Facebook feed for one day.
It's just raw material. And nevertheless, it's able to create a poem that seems more human than Gertrude Stein's poem, and Gertrude Stein is a human. So what we've done here is, more or less, a reverse Turing test. So Gertrude Stein, who's a human, is able to write a poem that fools a majority of human judges into thinking that it was written by a computer.
Therefore, according to the logic of the reverse Turing test, Gertrude Stein is a computer. Laughter Feeling confused? I think that's fair enough.